ArgMining 2019

6th Workshop on Argument Mining

August 1st, collocated with ACL 2019 in Florence, Italy

August 5, 2019. Thank you to all participants and committee members for a wonderful ArgMining 2019 workshop.

August 5, 2019. First slides and posters from the workshop can be found here. More to follow - stay tuned.

August 5, 2019. Pablo Accuosto and Horacio Saggion won the best paper award. Congratulations!

July 31, 2019. Posters and coffee breaks will be outside the room. More information here.

July 29, 2019. The ArgMining 2019 proceedings are out.

July 26, 2019. The workshop will take place in HALL 6 of Fortezza da Basso.

June 11, 2019. The schedule is out, including 1 keynote, 7 talks, 13 posters (1 demo) with lightning talks, a best paper award, and a special event.

June 10, 2019. We are happy to announce that a second keynote speaker will be joining ArgMining 2019: Marco Lippi.

May 31, 2019. The list of accepted papers is out. The oral acceptance rate is 19%, the overall acceptance rate 56%.

May 12, 2019. We slightly postponed the acceptance notification (now May 28) and the camera-ready version deadline (now June 5).

May 10, 2019. We are proud to say that ArgMining 2019 received 41 valid submissions. Once again, an all-time record (after 32 submissions last year).

April 23, 2019. Due to multiple requests, we postponed the submission deadline by one week (to May 3).

April 8, 2019. We are excited to announce that there will be a $500 best paper award, sponsored by IBM. Check our program.

February 25, 2019. We are delighted to announce that Giovanni Sartor will be our keynote speaker at ArgMining 2019. Check our program.

About the workshop

Argument mining (also known as "argumentation mining") is a young and emerging research area within computational linguistics. At its heart, argument mining involves the automatic identification of argumentative structures in free text, such as the conclusions, premises, and inference schemes of arguments as well as their interrelations and counter-considerations.

To date, researchers have investigated argument mining on genres such as legal documents, product reviews, news articles, online debates, user-generated web discourse, Wikipedia articles, academic literature, persuasive essays, tweets, and dialogues. Recently, also argument quality assessment came into focus. In addition, argument mining is inherently tied to stance and sentiment analysis, since every argument carries a stance towards its topic, often expressed with sentiment.

Argument mining gives rise to various practical applications of great importance. In particular, it provides methods that can find and visualize the main pro and con arguments in a text corpus - or even on in an argument search on the web - towards a topic or query of interest. In instructional contexts, written and diagrammed arguments represent educational data that can be mined for conveying and assessing students' command of course material. In information retrieval, argument mining is expected to play a salient role in the emerging field of conversational search. And with the IBM Debater, technology based on argument mining recently received a lot of media attention.

While solutions to basic tasks such as component segmentation and classification slowly become mature, many tasks remain largely unsolved, particularly in more open genres and topical domains. Success in argument mining requires interdisciplinary approaches informed by NLP technology, theories of semantics, pragmatics and discourse, knowledge of discourse in application domains, artificial intelligence, information retrieval, argumentation theory, and computational models of argumentation.